Ad blocking isn’t going anywhere. The ad tech industry has learned this the hard way after fighting tooth and nail over the past couple of years. PageFair cited double-digit growth in ad block adoption back in 2015. eMarketer concurred with its own report in 2016.
But there are silver linings despite revenue loss. Just as fake news highlighted the importance of bona-fide journalists and publishers, ad blocked inventory pushed media sellers and vendors towards making ad experience better for consumers on all devices.
The results of user-friendly measures make ad block impact look not quite as severe as PageFair or eMarketer would have us believe.
If publishers continue to respond to the ad-blocking threat with measured approaches, by 2020, revenue losses from ad blocking will be $10.5 billion (£7 billion) in the U.S., and $1.9 billion (£1.3 billion) in the U.K. The silver lining to that steep bill: It’s far lower than the $78 billion in losses Ovum predicts if nothing whatsoever is done to address ad blocking. (Source)
We scoured the web for statistics on ad blocking from a variety of trustworthy sources. Here’s what we found:
(Because in the age of alternative facts, we can’t even trust ‘data’ without taking a long, hard look at the source that compiled it. Here’s some perspective.)
Trouble in U.S. of A
Adobe Digital Insights Advertising Demand Report (2016)
[Note: The report cites ad blocking data from PageFair, whose latest report confirm ad block penetration per online capita data in USA at 18%.]There’s no easy way to put it: Ad block adoption is growing steadily in North America.
Compared to European countries, U.S. desktop ad block penetration is still relatively low on the scale (18%), but the impact (revenue loss) could be massive due to a larger internet user-base. Adobe also predicts that a growth in desktop ad block adoption similar to Germany or Sweden could mean another 23M U.S. ad block users.
The research compiles results from a survey of 1,000+ U.S. consumers where 89% of respondents said that they plan on continuing ad block use.
The survey highlighted some actionable user concerns over display advertising:
- Top consumer complaints and ad block adoption triggers: 1 in 2 respondents were driven to use ad blocks due to unskippable videos, over-targeting and abuse of personal data, auto-play audio/video, and pop-ups.
- Frequency (No. of times an ad is seen): 1 in 5 respondents say they find repetitive ads annoying.
- Video ad lengths: 1 in 3 respondents were annoyed by video ad lengths.
- 37% of respondents said they will be willing to pay for ad-free content on the internet.
Not Quite a Crisis: Canada and Germany
IAB Canada/comScore: Study measures incidences of ad blocking on pageviews, instead of number of ad block installs for specific location / device.
Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) and Online-Vermarkterkreis (OVK), a central body of German online advertising, released data for ad block incidence rates in Germany.
Canadian publishers may be able to take a breather. In a research with an opt-in panel of 30,000+ Desktop PC users, IAB Canada and comScore found that monthly ad blocking adoption rates remained stable from June 2015 to January 2016 (study timeframe), and the levels persisted for the rest of Q1 in 2016.
According to this report:
- 1 in 6 (17%) Canadians actively used ad block in Q1 2016.
- Ad blocking on desktop (15%) is three times more prevalent than on mobile devices (5%).
- Content categories like Entertainment, Gaming, and Sports show higher-than-average incidence of ad blocked pageviews (delivery of ads blocked on 22 – 33% pageviews).
- Premium publishers, on the whole, see a lower ad block rate than 17%.
- 13% of Canadians had previously installed ad blocking software but have since disabled or deleted it from their system, citing reasons like blocked content/website features and interference with browser/device features.
- 79% respondents believed their browsing experience improved through adblock.
- 78% of online Canadians prefer free, ad-supported online content versus pay-for-content options
Meanwhile, Germany, one of the earliest adopters of ad block, showed a modest dip in ad block incidence rates from Q1 to Q3 of 2016.
PageFair’s 2017 report, however, pegs ad block penetration (largely desktop and negligible mobile) for Canada at 25% and Germany at 29%.
Note that neither research is wrong or deliberately misleading. This is where the difference in research methodology should become clear: Incidence rates are real-time and should be read as number of requested web pages on which ads were ultimately blocked. PageFair looks at adoption/penetration rate, which is the number of internet users with ad block software installed in a given region.
Mobile Ad Blocking: Massive in Asia-Pacific, not so much anywhere else
GlobalWebIndex Trends’17 Report (Pgs. 42-45)
Mobile ad blocking is currently on a ‘low simmer’ in Europe and Americas. Many large-scale publishers (Trinity Mirror, Axel Springer’s Bild, City AM, etc.) have even come forward to say that it’s a non-issue, citing ad blocked mobile pageviews as low as 2%. (Source)
But mobile ad block is huge in Asia-Pacific. In a global survey of respondents aged 16-64 in Q2-Q3 2016, Global Web Index found that India and China have the largest mobile ad block user base. The data is confirmed by PageFair 2017 report, which says that 94% of global mobile ad block usage is in Asia-Pacific.
The rapid mobile ad block adoption in fast growth APAC markets can be attributed to general peskiness of ads, but also to necessity. 34% mobile ad block users said their main motivation was to prevent mobile data loss on ads.
In some fast-growth APAC markets, mobile ad-blockers have become a vital tool for reducing load-times and data spend, especially where internet users are coming online for the first time via relatively expensive and slow mobile connections.
— GWI Trends ’17 Report
PageFair also reports 1-2% mobile ad block adoption rates in European and American markets. Here’s their take on mobile ad block moving west:
Mass adoption in North America and Europe will continue organically, but may accelerate unexpectedly if manufacturers or distributors close deals to pre-configure adblock software.
Key Takeaways
A significant majority of respondents in all these studies agreed on some key points:
- About one-third of respondents (in any study mentioned above) said they would pay for an ad-free online experience.
- Intrusive ad formats must go, along with auto-play audio/video, pop-ups, and poor ad layouts (too much screen space devoted to ads in any given screen/page fold is a major turn off).
- Preferred ad formats include static banners, skippable videos, and native.
- Irrelevance and frequency of ads are commonly cited complaints, but so is concern about over-targeting.
- 3 in 4 ad block users would leave when confronted with an ‘ad block wall’. Websites publishing generic, easily-available-elsewhere content would not provide enough motivation for visitors to disable ad blocks.
All things considered, a majority of consumers would still prefer free content on “open web” and would put up with ads if the content is worth it, to a reasonable extent. It’s up to publishers to respect the line and realize that UX is not a buzzword anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment